Epic fails without a proofreader/editor

It’s easy to misspell a word here or there or forget important punctuation on occasion, but sometimes those blunders can be embarrassing and even laughable which can really mess with your reputation, especially because readers are laughing at you, not with you! The benefit of having an external proofreader and/or editor is that a good grammar checker will ensure you don’t miss important gear that makes your copy readable and accurate, eliminating all possibility of humiliation.

Things like this!!!! -- need to be used sparingly as they dilute what you are inferring to. They can be taken the wrong way, bringing their own tone and sound angry or even smart arsey. This goes for over using ellipsis, which should be three dots only, not seven. Also, emoticons we use in text? -- not punctuation, :-0 okay? Good punctuation is imperative, it’s powerful. Imagine if I wrote, ‘Let’s eat nana’, instead of ‘Let’s eat, Nana?’ or ‘Wanted: one-night stand’ rather than ‘Wanted: one nightstand’. It matters to get it right or you could be in real trouble.

Sometimes missing letters or words can be catastrophic for a writer. A good spell checker won’t leave you hanging with ‘Boob’ when it was meant to be ‘Bob’, or ‘Joe Bloggs, rapist’, instead of ‘Joe Bloggs, Therapist’ or ‘White Ho reporter, Jane Bloggs’, instead of ‘White House reporter, Jane Bloggs’…see what I mean? Awkward.

The point is, we proofread our writing for grammatical errors and bad spelling, but punctuation is equally significant. It’s hard these days because many of us write blogs and those of us that do, write conversationally; the way we speak. I think that’s fine but in newsprint, newsletters, corporate documentation, websites and student uni dissertations, it needs to be formalised. Cut out the additional ellipses and use em dashes, forget the slang – dress up your language. I know we don’t say, in real life, things like, ‘please don’t hesitate to call me should you require anything further’, we say, ‘give me a call if I can help you with anything else…’ but that’s how we roll and what people expect, unless it’s a novel or piece of creative writing, then there is a colloquialism expectation and acceptance.

On occasion, grammatical errors are mistaken for spelling errors. This is when the spelling is actually correct but used inaccurately, such as ‘the plain descended rapidly’ rather than ‘plane’ or ‘breath easy’, instead of ‘breathe easy’. These are not spelling gaffes, they are grammar blunders, and they are not okay.  

There are plenty of freelance editors and proofreaders out there, it just so happens. I’m the best ;-)…whoops just broke my own rule. www.kirstieanders.com 

Tautologies and Feedback

When writing a paper, using a trillion purposeless words are a waste of time. They’re unnecessarily filling. It’s like pouring custard on a custard tart. Why would you do it? It is an obvious striving to reach that word count that looms ahead of you and you have run out of references or things to say. Thing is, your lecturer knows this.  You’re probably better off being under the word count than adding verbose jargon.  Reading papers like this as an editor and proofreader is like listening to a wordy little tune by Paul Simon about a bat faced girl.  No-one really enjoys that. My red pen comes out and slashes at these words with teeth bared and great resolve and gladness.  Superfluous words like tautologies of; in  addition or worse - in addition to that, furthermore, also, still, moreover, henceforth (personal disgust), hereafter, nonetheless, nevertheless. Then there is the over use of ‘the’ and ‘so’.  You don’t need to use ‘the’ all the time. ‘The best practice’ for example is okay, in fact superior being called ‘best practice’.  I can often see thesaurus suggestions jump out at me in paragraphs that have required paraphrasing. Phrases like ‘a large proportion’ instead of the word, ‘many’. ‘By virtue of the fact that’, actually just ‘because’ would do. What about ‘sum total’ isn’t that the same thing? Or ‘unexpected surprise?’  However, (there just did it myself, but sometimes it is necessary, you can’t always just leap into a room without knocking first) reading page after page where an author has consistently and persistently used the same phrase at every paragraph without pause, like ‘in addition’ rather than mixing it up just a bit really does my head in. 

It’s funny, or maybe not that funny, that authors have asked me after proofreading and/or editing many works, what I thought of the paper as a whole. I do understand this but find it immaterial too. My role is to correct it, make it better, they want the feedback. I feel that it’s a bit like when a defendant asks his/her lawyer, ‘do you think I'm innocent?’ and the lawyer says, ‘it’s not what I think, it’s what I can prove’. It doesn't matter what I think, it’s what I can do to make it the best it can be. But I understand that feedback is important and I'm the one reading their work so it makes sense. What I have noticed is that when I give feedback, the client develops more of a trust with me and I feel more supportive. It alters our relationship just that little bit and in a positive way because I have gone from just some entity making red and blue marks on their papers to someone who has some feeling and opinion about what they have written. I think they deserve feedback and make a point now to give some encouraging comments as well as suggestions of what they might need to change to make it great. Proofreader and editor? http://kirstieanders16.wix.com/editingproofreading